邢爱芬 韩容:An Analysis of Jurisprudence of Article 3 of ECHR and its’ Implication - 分论坛二 - 中国人权网

首页 > 专题2019 > 首届中国人权青年论坛 > 分论坛 > 分论坛二 >

邢爱芬 韩容:An Analysis of Jurisprudence of Article 3 of ECHR and its’ Implication
2019-03-28 10:48:14   来源:中国人权网   作者:

分享:
收藏 复制 打印
报告人:北京师范大学法学院教授邢爱芬

报告人:北京师范大学法学院研究生韩容
 
  分论坛二:全球治理与人权保障(主题2 区域人权保障)

  题目:An Analysis of Jurisprudence of Article 3 of ECHR and its’ Implication

Abstract: This article will analysis the way in which the ECtHR interpret and apply Article 3 of ECHR through a series of cases of the prohibition of torture. To be more specific, our analysis will pay attention to the general opinions of ECtHR concerning the obligation under the Article 3 of ECHR, and the assessment criteria of the violation this provision. In order to achieve this purpose, we will take a look at the jurisprudence of Article 3 of ECHR. Firstly, we will use some jurisprudence to briefly elaborate the absolute nature and the positive obligation of the State members proscribed by the Article 3 of ECHR. Then, it turns to the specific case concerning the ill-treatment and non-refoulment principal, and the tension between the safety of a community like anti-terrorism actions and the prohibition of torture. What’s more, diplomatic assurance is another factor to be considered in the evaluation whether or not a treatment fall into the category of being contrary to Article 3 of ECHR. After that, there is a brief analysis of the implication of the ECtHR’s jurisprudence of the prohibition of torture on the interpretation and application of Article 3 of ECHR and the experience which is provided to other States and international institutions. 

  评议人:

  朱晓青 中国社会科学院国际法研究所研究员

  戴 菁 中共中央党校(国家行政学院)报刊社专刊室副主任、副编审
 
\

中国社会科学院国际研究所研究员朱晓青对题为《An Analysis of Jurisprudence of Article 3 of ECHR and its’ Implication》的报告进行评议。(贾璞玉摄)

\

中共中央党校报刊社专刊室副主任戴菁对题为《An Analysis of Jurisprudence of Article 3 of ECHR and its’ Implication》的报告进行评议。(贾璞玉摄)
相关热词搜索:

上一篇:李崇涛:在法庭安全与公正审判之间:刑事庭审中的“法庭囚笼”问题研究
下一篇:叶亚楠:《联合国和平权利宣言》的现实困境与实现路径